|
|
||||||
| General Discussion Discussion on metal detecting. Some off topic postings are allowed. If in doubt read our posting rules. |
Members currently using Flashchat: 0
|
|
![]() |
The most chatters online in one day was 8, 05-26-2008. No one is currently using the chat. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
sorry i havent posted in a while. i really dont have much of an excuse other than it just slipped my mind.
its been so cold here i havent been getting out much this winter anyway. i did pick up an explorer se just before it turned into friggin alaska around here. |
|
|||
|
ok...............this is wierd............ i click on this post and i can read the original post, but i cant read any of your replies????? anyone know what the heck is going on? private message me if you do because i wont be able to see your reply!
![]() |
|
|||
|
Good luck with your new SE and Delaware has gotten a taste of real winter the last few weeks. Ground started to thaw and then this cold weather again. Curious how you compare the Minelab SE vs the Garrett 2500. I had a GTP 1350 and now trying to get time with a Sov GT but using an M6 at the trashiest areas of which there are many
Good Luck. HH Bill |
|
|||
|
hey! thanks for the replies everyone! .........bill, my first impression of the se was a good one. keep in mind that i have only used it on about 4 hunts so far, but the first thing i noticed was a big increase in depth over the 2500. i found 2 wheaties and 2 silver roosies at about 8 inches with it during those 4 hunts. with the 2500 it would be rare to dig a coin at 8 inches. the DD coil on the se was a little differant than the coil on the 2500, but it wasnt that hard to get used to . the se has a steeper learning curve than the 2500 however, and i really missed the size feature of the 2500, but the increased depth more than made up for it. the display on the se can be a little tough to read in direct sunlight, even after i adjusted the contrast, but that is a small gripe. one thing about the minelab, is that it is a slow sweep machine. you need to take more time with each swing in order to let the machine process the additional frequencies it is transmitting. if i had a large area to cover and i was trying to find the hotspots within those big areas, i would probably go with the 2500 because you can swing it much faster than the se.once i found some stuff however i think i would grab the se and slow down to thoroughly cover the area. all in all both machines are very nice,and its kind of like comparing apples to oranges, but for sheer depth the se is the clear cut winner.for ease of operation, speed, and discrim capabilities i would say its the 2500. most of the hunting i do is at hunted out schools and parks so i think most times i will probably opt for the added depth of the se, but i am going to hang on to the 2500 as well. i think the two compliment each other nicely.
|
|
|||
|
I use a Pack Mule when i have 2 minelabs with me
hollowpointred, Thanks for offering your initial impression on the difference in operation of the 2 detectors. Seems like they offset each other enough to have a good feel when to use one vs the other. HH Bill |
|
|||
|
dont feel bad it just as cold here although its supposed to warm up dramatially beginning tomorrow. it was -20 degrees last night here in upstate ny warmer today though. looking forward for the snow to go . got ot get out and do something.
|