Treasure Quest  |  Civil War Quest  | Metal Detector Resource

Go Back   Metal Detecting Forums at Treasure Quest > Metal Detecting > Metal Detecting Questions & Answers
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!


Metal Detecting Questions & Answers Ask your Metal Detecting related questions here & get answers from our experts.

Members currently using Flashchat: 0
The most chatters online in one day was 9, 08-01-2008.
No one is currently using the chat.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2007, 09:34 PM
New TQ Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
Default Info needed for the new guy!

Hello everyone! I am at a fork in the crossroads and was wonder if I could get some input?



I’m in need of a submersible detector and have narrowed my choices down to the Excalibur 1000 or the Tesoro Tiger Shark. I will be frequenting the coastal waters of NC but also plan to use my new detector on land and in fresh water as well. I have come to accept the fact that there are no “all purpose” detectors and that a water detector will not function on land as well as a detector designed specifically for land. I would like to come as close as possible.

I have spoken with dealers that sell both products and have received different opinions from each. Some say go for the Excalibur and some say go for the Tiger Shark.

Reasons being….

(Excalibur)

The Excalibur outshines the Tiger shark but it’s too heavy on land. If you hip mount it you will run into wiring issues.


(Tiger Shark)

The Tiger shark is lower in price and has a lifetime warranty. It’s also easier to change coil sizes on the Tiger shark.


According to specs the Excalibur weighs 4.5lbs and the Tiger shark Weighs 4.5 lbs??? Why am I not being told that both units are too heavy for land use? They both weigh the same. Are the hip mounts different in some way?

I have also read way too many posts stating that “the Tiger shark is no good in the salt” but shines in fresh water? This concerns me? Can anyone provide more info on this?

I don’t want to start any product wars just want some honest opinions from some regular users.


Thanks a bunch!

Last edited by searchin70; 03-22-2007 at 09:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2007, 10:14 PM
New TQ Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
Default

Hey Chuck!

Yes.....We did speak on the phone and thanks for the call back and all the info. Unfortunately our connection was pretty bad and I got about half of it. I was hoping if I posted you would pipe up. I wanted to thank you anyway!! I also figured I would get some more info from the users of this board. Please don't hesitate to sum up what you told me earlier. Like I said I really had some bad cell service.


According to specs the Excalibur weighs 4.5lbs and the Tiger shark Weighs 4.5 lbs??? Why am I not being told that both units are too heavy for land use? They both weigh the same. Are the hip mounts different in some way?

I have also read way too many posts stating that “the Tiger shark is no good in the salt” but shines in fresh water? This concerns me? Can anyone provide more info on this?


Thanks!!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2007, 03:40 AM
Veteran TQ Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 426
Thumbs up Which detector??

I can't speak for the TigerShark but I do own the Fisher 1280X and the Excalibur 800 and have pluses for both. Since you didn't mention the 1280X, I won't go into detail on it.

As for the Excalibur having 17 frequencies is an advantage and I have found it to be a good land and water detector and have found very small gold toe rings in the water with good solid signals. I also tried it in the cold weather and it still functions perfectly even with ice forming on the coil ( I have had detector coil failures in cold weather with older detectors ) while this is usually not an issue it is nice to know that discriminaton and everything else will function under these extreem cold conditions.

The 17 frequencies (same as the Minelab Soverign) are a big help in locating a variety of targets and while there is no meter, you do have Tone ID which works well both above and below water.

The other problem with working in the water is resistance to swinging the coil. Any detector will give you lots of resistance here, but the Excalibur is a slow sweep detector, so it will still be functioning at peak under these conditions. It can also be reconfigured with the control housing and battery turned 1/4 turn to one side to reduce resistance. Also the cables on the Excalibur are 'heavy duty' and not prone to damage, so this detector is a rugged package.

A spare battery pack WILL be pricy for the Exaclibur, but you can get the batteries 're-stuffed' quite reasonably (I use Car-go-Batteries in Denver, but there is sure to be a similar business near you).

IMPORTANT THOUGHT: When working in the water, tie a rope (3-4ft long) to the detector near the grip and to your belt so it can't get washed away from you by the waves. This way if you have to let go, it is easily retrieved.

Hope this gives you some insight.

Happy Hunting

Joe

Last edited by cjoej; 03-23-2007 at 03:41 AM. Reason: clarification
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parts Needed Lost Scotsman Garrett Metal Detectors 3 04-05-2007 01:37 PM
help needed bone Metal Detecting Questions & Answers 6 01-21-2007 09:25 AM
Help needed Rocke H General Discussion 2 12-21-2006 09:48 PM
Help needed now! BigAl General Discussion 0 01-26-2005 10:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 AM.


Related Websites:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2001-2008 Treasure Quest | Metal Detecting Forum

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231