Treasure Quest  |  Civil War Quest  | Metal Detector Resource

Go Back   Metal Detecting Forums at Treasure Quest > Metal Detector Forums > Whites Metal Detectors
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!


Whites Metal Detectors Welcome to the Whites Metal Detectors Forum. One of the oldest and most reliable manufacturers of hobby metal detectors, Whites Metal Detectors are abundant with the latest technological advances in the metal detecting hobby. Click in here to ask your questions, and for all of the latest tips and tricks that make Whites Metal Detector users so successful.

Members currently using Flashchat: 0
The most chatters online in one day was 9, 08-01-2008.
No one is currently using the chat.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2007, 09:49 AM
Dick from IA's Avatar
Veteran TQ Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Dodge Iowa
Posts: 237
Default M6 Owners; How Do You Like Yours?

I've been researching the new M6 White's Detector, and do like some of the features it offers. I've read where the 7 tone signals are very helpful and that pinpointing is very accurate.

What is your opinion, M6 owners??
__________________
Dick from IA
The RVing Detectorist
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2007, 02:13 PM
Treasure Quest Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 554
Default

Just about as much power as the Excellent MXT with a straight up coinshooters mentality. You won't be dissapointed with one. Let me know If I can help you with your purchase.
__________________
TonyinCT
WWW.TCMETALDETECTORS.COM
Tesoro Gold Star dealer
Whites 5 Star dealer
Fisher Platinum dealer
Minelab,Garrett,BountyHunter,
Sunray,DetectorPro,Vibraprobe
860-623-1153
TreasureQuest Forum Sponsor
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2007, 03:22 PM
Master TQ Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: delaware
Posts: 685
Donation Level 2 
Default

Hi Dick,

I was overloaded with 5 and 6khz detectors and wanted a higher frequency detector to better cover the lower conductive targets and was a bit hesitant deciding on the M6 and traded for one about 4 months ago and love the thing. It's got most of what i wanted on the Classic IDX Pro and more with the exception of the All Metal ID which is great on the Classics. The tracking circuit is amazing how it cancels out bad ground and mineralized rocks so quickly and has ability to lock the best setting.

For some reason the 7 tone id just clicked with me and along with using small coils, "0" disc and the quick recovery speed i'm eager to rehunt the older trashy sites that lost my interest.It ain't perfect but a real nice detector in my opinion. HH Bill
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2007, 08:37 PM
Veteran TQ Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 182
Default

Dick,

I love mine. I have been using it with the standard coil it came with and have done very well in some pretty trashy areas. I just received the 4X6 coil today so can't wait to get back and re-search some of these areas. It is so simple to operate it's almost impossible to set it up wrong. I see lots of posts about some of the more expensive machines and people having lots of questions about setting them up. This machine is easy so you spend your time hunting and not fidling with controls. I also am hearing that this machine does about as good as the MXT. If I am not mistaken the electronics for the M6 is based on the MXT circuitry with simpler controls. I love the 7 tone feature because you don't have to watch the LCD display you can just search by sound. Those high tones get your attention and that's usually the good stuff. I find the pinpointing feature to be right on and the depth indication is as well. I love going behind other treasure hunters. The last time I found several indian head pennies 7" deep they missed. The ground tracking system is easy to set up or change, just a flick of the switch. I have never had to balance the machine it seems to be automatic. Ground conditions here are not problematic. I normally use the auto trac feature. It does have a beach mode which should help in severe bad ground conditions. I don't think you will be disappointed.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2007, 10:53 PM
Dick from IA's Avatar
Veteran TQ Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Dodge Iowa
Posts: 237
Default

Thanks for the replies, you guys, on the M6.

Another question: I am more of an old coins hunter than for modern clad and jewelry, and while in the "boonies" I like to get some relics, too. How would you classify the M6 in respect to just casual Relic Hunting?; keeping in mind I'm just a "once in awhile" relic hunter and won't be digging every signal and burrowing to China for the finds.

Thanks
__________________
Dick from IA
The RVing Detectorist
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2007, 01:53 AM
Seasoned TQ Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 56
Default

Hi Dick,

I think you know my position on the M6 quite well. I feel the M6 would serve you well in the type of hunting you do. It would also serve you well on your hunts on the beaches along the eastern coast. I has done a good job of getting me some nice silver coins since I got it along with clad and jewlery. As for relic hunting, as sensitive as this machine is on iron, brass and cilver I can't imagine it not being a good relics machine.

Has almost all the features you are used to other then notch. Great tracking system, very good accuracy at pinpointing, pretty solid VDI numbers and the different tone modes give the options of tones. Battery life on this machine is a real plus also. Put all that with an endless selection of coils from 4" up and concentric to DD you can't go wrong. Keep us adviced on what you end up doing.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2007, 03:36 PM
New TQ Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Castle, Delaware
Posts: 4
Default

Really not much more that I can add that hasn't already been stated by the other posters regarding the M6.

I've just returned to the hobby, and, detectors sure have changes since the '70s. I bought a Prizm V back in early December and had a blast with it. I wanted to upgrade so I looked at the MXT and the DFX. After researching the two and visiting my local dealer I decided on the M6...mainly for it's simplicity.

My main interests are coin and jewelry hunting at beach and parks.

I took the M6 to the beach the other day at it worked well. I'm looking forward to many more hunting trips with my M6.

Best,
Brian
__________________
White's Prizm V & Matrix M6
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2007, 04:24 PM
Veteran TQ Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 135
Default

Hi Dick I also own an m6 I purchased on 4-20-06 and since I've found 28 silver coins many buffalo's 5 rings and many other trinkets my deepest digs were 10 + inches deep and a silver half @ 13" . you also will not miss silver,copper or lead with this machine and gold and nickels will read the same on mine around 18 vdi pull tabs are always in the 20's so check and dig all lower signals. it is also a quarter magnet, but I believe this is true of most detectors. goodluck! If I can be of any help just ask thanks Don (PS I didn't even get out that much in 06 but 07 is another year)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2007, 09:41 PM
WeaponUSMC's Avatar
Veteran TQ Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Back in Findlay Ohio....Again
Posts: 190
Default M6

Ive had my M6 for about 9 months now. And use mine for Civil War relic hunting. My hunting partner use's the high end explorer II and my machine that cost half as much as his finds just as much. On the bullets some of the tones you have to get used too, just a high pitch squak over each way normaly indicates a good bullet tone, not the steady tone like a coin. Buttons and other campfire finds give normal tone for what there made of. The only feature I dont like is the "overload" signal, a can will give it to you very easily.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2007, 08:00 AM
Master TQ Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: delaware
Posts: 685
Donation Level 2 
Default

Nice to hear of your success hunting Civil War Relics. Do you use tone id
hunting relics or just single tone and if yes have you found any difference in the ability to hear the deeper signals using Tone ID.

Most of my finds are within the top 6" to 7" and use tone id almost exclusively due to the heavy trash at most of my sites and feel the single tone may provide a little better audio on the deeper targets but tone id is still audible throughout the depth range. Any thoughts on this Weapon USMC or anyone?

I'd also be curious as to the finds rate between the M6 and MXT in a side by side relic hunt just to see how much fringe sensitivity was cut from the M6. HH Bill
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where are the Minelab owners? w4wsm Minelab Metal Detectors 29 09-23-2006 06:03 PM
Garrett / Gti Sunray Owners shermanville illinois Metal Detecting Questions & Answers 0 01-30-2006 11:32 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.


Related Websites:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2001-2008 Treasure Quest | Metal Detecting Forum

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231